T-01
Scream cream ingredient evidence explorer
The per-compound data component: every study behind every documented ingredient, filterable by ingredient, by which documented formulas contain it, and by evidence grade. Renders the central fact as a browsable surface: the blend row is empty, and the best-studied arousal-cream drug is not in the product.
The per-compound data component: every study behind every documented ingredient, filterable by ingredient, by which documented formulas contain it, and by evidence grade. Renders the central fact as a browsable surface: the blend row is empty, and the best-studied arousal-cream drug is not in the product.
Published records (7 of 7)
| Ingredient | Formulas | Best evidence | Grade | Approved topical |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sildenafil | CareFirst; Kare Rx 2% (absent from Climax Cream) | Topical 3.6%: 200-woman RCT ITT-null, post hoc subset P=.04. Oral: null broad, positive narrow | human-rct | No |
| Aminophylline | CareFirst | Zero arousal studies; topical record is thigh-fat trials (one positive series, one null RCT) | bibliographic | No |
| Theophylline | Kare Rx 3% (both variants) | Zero arousal studies | bibliographic | No |
| L-arginine | All three documented formulas | Zero topical arousal studies; oral supplement trials do not transfer | bibliographic | No |
| Pentoxifylline | CareFirst; Kare Rx Climax Cream 5% | Zero female-arousal studies of any route | bibliographic | No |
| Ergoloid mesylates | CareFirst; Kare Rx Climax Cream 0.05% | No trials in women; one male ED combination-cream trial (n=42) | human-rct | No |
| Phentolamine | CareFirst | 6-woman oral pilot; 41-woman vaginal study significant only in HRT users | human-rct | No |
Every row restates a published record; sources resolve on the sourced monograph. Species is part of the data: this table never scales an animal dose into a human figure.
Frequently asked questions
Why does this site have tables instead of a calculator?
Because there is nothing honest to compute: no validated dose, no fixed formula, no absorption data. The tables make the documented facts browsable; a calculator would fabricate precision.
Where do the formula rows come from?
From pharmacy product pages fetched and archived on 2026-08-14, cited as market documentation: proof of what is sold, never evidence that it works.
Can I use the explorer to pick a better formula?
It will show you which ingredients have any evidence and which have none, which is real information; but no combination has blend-level trials, so 'better' tops out at 'less unstudied.'
Why do rows keep saying a drug that is not in scream cream has the best trials?
Because that is the documented situation: alprostadil owns the FSAD-cream trial record and appears in no formula we verified. The explorer exists so that fact stays visible.
Tools: educational calculators and references only.